THE PROBLEM
How similar active treatment systems successfully worked in two completely different regions
The state of Florida and the state of Alaska have strict turbidity counts requirements for stormwater runoff at construction sites. Despite each region having a completely different climate, two recent construction projects in Florida and Alaska benefited from the use of the natural biopolymer chitosan. In Florida chitosan was used with a mobile filtration system and in Alaska the chitosan was used with a biofiltration model through a muskeg bog. In both cases the resulting NTU levels in the water run-off were far below the required levels—making active treatment with chitosan the perfect solution for both construction sites.
Florida: treating large ponds on DOT multi-year construction project
In 2002, the Florida Department of Transportation began a multi-year construction program which came to a close at the end of 2009 was designed to modernize Interstates 10 and 110 in Escambia County. The program represented more than $400 million of construction work to improve mobility and enhance safety on the local interstate highways.
The I-10/I-110 and I-10/Davis Highway interchanges are located north of Pensacola and the two interchanges are closely spaced, essentially operating as a single interchange and are referred to as the I10/I-110/Davis Highway interchange
OUR SOLUTION
The following projects were a part of the work done:
- Widening Interstate 10 to six lanes between Davis Highway (Exit 13) and U.S. Highway 29 (Exit 10); and, widening I-110 to six lanes between the Interstate 10/110 interchange and the Airport Boulevard overpass.
- Replacement of the Interstate 10/Escambia Bay Bridge that was destroyed in 2004 by Hurricane Ivan.
- Widening Interstate 110 to six lanes between the Airport Boulevard overpass and Maxwell Street.
- Construction of a new Interstate 110 interchange at Airport Boulevard.
Throughout the construction site, the project has had to work on several very large storm water collection ponds. The storm water collection ponds needed to be dewatered to retain storage capacity for future rain events.
Mobile filtration systems, provided by Rain for Rent, were extremely successful throughout this large construction project. Using a product called StormKlear the systems were able to easily meet the Florida NTU turbidity requirements. The requirements state discharge cannot exceed 29 NTUs over background waters. Background historically is around 5 NTUs in this part of the state. The panhandle of Florida receives some of the state’s highest rainfall averages, the project expected to receive around 60” annually.
Archer Western, the contractor for the project, called in the services of Rain for Rent to build the mobile treatment. Rain for Rent incorporated several sand filtration systems and recommended the use of the StormKlear product in their systems because of the success they had with the product on projects in both Maryland and Washington.
Starting in February of 2008, Archer Western began running 2 multi-pod sand filter systems to dewater a 16 acre stormwater collection pond. The systems were required throughout the ‘wet season’ (spring, summer and fall). Each treatment systems were capable of treating a 1,000 gpm, but average flow rates were around 700 gpm per system. Total water treated is estimated to be around 150 million gallons of stormwater.
The nature of the material keep it in suspension, thus Rain for Rent choose the biopolymer GelFloc product which is made from crustaceans shells, a waste product of the seafood industry. Because of its performance with sand filtration and its ability to field detect against residual polymer, the Rain for Rent system met the contractors needs.
Starting NTU in the ponds fluctuated between 75 and 400 NTUs depending on rainfall and pond water level. Discharge was between 0.5 and 28 NTU with average discharge between 5 and 10 NTUs. Turbidity was taken manually 3 to 4 times per day or if any significant change occurred. Photo 1 below shows the suction float where the inlet water is drawn into the pump for filtration. The road construction project is located just beyond the pond.
Photo 1
Part of the pond was being filled in as required by the construction project. However the smaller storage capacity then required that the systems need to treat water more often.
Photo 2 below, shows the largest pond, 16 acres in size. The construction in the foreground shows how the pond is being filled in to reduce its size. The discharge from this pond averaged between 5-10 NTUs at 700-1500 gpm.
Photo 2
Rain for Rent provided mobile treatment systems and equipment which were staged on dams between the ponds (Photo 3 and Photo 4).
Photo 3
Photo 4
4-pod sand filtration systems which used the GelFloc as a filter aid.
Photo 5
Photo 5 shows the filtration system viewed from the discharge point.
The particles that caused the turbidity were very small and didn’t want to settle out with gravity. The GelFloc aided the systems by floccing the small particles together so the sand filters could remove. Because the GelFloc is biodegradable, there was not a concern of bioaccumulation.
Photo 6 below shows the discharge area. This is the point at which samples are taken of the discharge for NTU measurement and occasionally pH levels. Testing for free residual chitosan is also tested here using the StormKlear Residual Chitosan kit, designed to make on-site measuring easier and ensure compliance.
Photo 6
Photo 7 & 8 below show the discharge into the creek which drains into the stream and a close up of the water clarity at the point of the discharge pipe.
Photo 7
Photo 8
The third pond on the site is an alum treatment pond. The DOT originally specified alum and pays the contractor to use the 2 pallets that were delivered on site. Alum is stored under plastic in photo 4. Alum drops pH levels below acceptable and pH has been raised before batch discharge can occur. Alum is only allowed in batch treatment. However the contractor has stated that the with the needed pH adjusters, the alum system is not nearly as inexpensive as originally specified.
GREAT RESULT:
Because the Rain for Rent system was able to operate in a flow-through model, it was the best model for this application. This project has now come to a close and shows how invaluable a mobile treatment process can be for a large, multi-year project of this magnitude.
Alaska: Airport Runway in Alaska requires innovative stormwater treatment for compliance and preservation
Petersburg Alaska is a fishing village located in southeast Alaska. Located on Mitkof Island, situated roughly 120 miles from Juneau to the north and Ketchikan to the south, the town of around three thousand has maintained its quaint feel and its Norwegian heritage. The Petersburg James A. Johnson Airport (PSG) needed to upgrade its Runway Safety Area (RSA) from the existing 200 ft to the FAA compliant 1000 ft. Additionally, the RSA would be widened to 500 ft along its entire length. A total of five new cross-runway culverts would be installed and redirecting drainages to pass through the newly installed culverts.
The initial phase required excavation down sometimes over 40’ below the runway surface through soils predominate in glacial till overlaid with peat and muskeg up to 20 feet deep. Due to closure of the airport the project window required 24 hour day work during the initial snow melt and the beginning of the rainy season. Numerous erosion and sediment control measures were used to minimize sedimentation runoff from impairing drainage basins that lead right through the town and into the narrows between Kupreanof and Mitkof Islands. Kiewit Pacific Contractors was diligent in working with the Alaska Department of Transportion (DOT) to find multiple methods of preventing erosion and dealing with sediment on the project. One method of erosion prevention was to pump the snow melt and rainfall from one side of the project to the other and eliminate run-on. To accomplish this, Power Prime pumps from Rain for Rent were used in tandem.
Due to the high volume of bypass water, precautions were taken to prevent scour at the discharge points. Large native boulders were placed on a Geotextile liner as a means of energy dissipation prior to draining into the basin.
With an average 234 days of precipitation in annual rainfall of over 110” and 61.5” of snowfall, the volume of moisture along with large amounts of clay material the likelihood of very turbid stormwater runoff was extremely high. The Alaska Department of Transportation (ADOT) in coordination with the FAA, Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation and Alaska Department of Fish and Game, set up a pilot treatment BMP using a natural biopolymer chitosan (pronounced kahy-tuh-san) in a biofiltration model thru muskeg bog. The muskeg bog was located in an area that was permitted by the US Corps of Engineers to eventually be filled as part of the runway extension project.
The stormwater collected during the culvert installations was pumped up to 5000’ to a treatment system located at the end of the runway. The treatment system included four treatment trains to reduce system performance concerns and to enhance the data collection. Two products were used for comparative purposes, StormKlear GelFloc and ChitoVan LC. Chitosan was chosen because of its proven track record on glacial clays, its complete biodegradability, low toxicity and residual monitoring capability in the field for any excess polymer. Because of the remote location, the expense of transporting samples and the construction schedule demands residual testing at outside laboratories was unfeasible and impractical. A reliable field test needed to be available to ensure no environmental impact would be caused from the pilot system.
An overview of the runway is seen in the picture below. The treatment system is shown to the right of the runway in what looks like a baseball field.
The treatment system consisted of four valves (one to each treatment train), followed by sock chambers (8” PVC in ‘Y’ shape for access during sock changes) and a “sprinkler head” for high agitation of the polymer prior to arrayed directional discharge. Mini weired ponds were added to prevent scour of the bog. See picture.
A semicircular silt fence installation was used to control any surface water runoff on top of the bog. The system had significant results with intake water running over 5000 NTUs at times; dropping to 279 NTUs at the discharge from the lower weir pond to 92 NTUs at the silt fence and about 40 NTUs after surface flow had passed through the organics about 20 feet further. The picture below shows the vast difference in treated and untreated water.
Alex Zimmerman, CPESC, of CSI Geosynthetics in Vancouver, WA consulted with ADOT on the project and the permitting of the pilot treatment system design and operation. Southeast Alaska conditions challenge the best contractors, with the sole airport for the island closed during the culvert replacement delays of any kind were not an option. All residual chitosan monitoring and system operation was conducted by John Barnett, CISEC, an Environmental Impact Analyst with ADOT’s SE Regional Office in Juneau. John noted that “Residual chitosan at the outlets of the treatment system remained below detection levels and turbidity reductions were generally quite impressive. I was surprised at the overall effectiveness of chitosan socs with water temperatures that were consistently close to 0o C. Although still very effective in reducing turbidity, the colder water may have reduced the solubility of chitosan thereby reducing the risk of detectable residuals. I was also pleased to see very little deviation in background dissolved oxygen (DO) or pH”. Art Dunn, CPESC, ADOT Permit Compliance Reviewer stated ”Chitosan will be an extremely valuable tool in our ongoing effort to comply with the Clean Water Act in this extremely challenging environment”.
The residual testing methods for chitosan allowed field verification of the retention of muskeg bog soils of sediment and polymer. With over 90 water samples taken during 3 major dewatering events over a 3 week period, treatment effectiveness in a cold water
environment was verified under conditions considered extreme at best and impossible at times.
PSG 001 – intake, PSG 002 – weir pond discharge, PSG 003 – silt fence
Reverse angle of treatment system with coir logs used for small sediment pond with a liner. The initial deposition area proved effective at preventing the clogging of the muskeg and burial of the existing vegetation extending the life of the treatment area. Providing for an initial deposition area of chitosan treated discharge must always be considered, especially in frozen and freeze thaw conditions.
With salmon population endangered from environmental impacts and the town of Petersburg’s economy so closely tied to the seafood industry, it will take proactive approaches in stormwater management to prevent further harm and maintain the majestic environment that is Alaska, the final frontier.